Is AI social?
I'm not sure that it is, but I've been in a deep dive into AI for my other class, and for prep work for my position starting this fall. One thing appears clear--a whole like of training needs to go into AI literacy. I think it is nice to think that we'll all "figure it out" through using it. But Dr. Dennen's post on LinkedIn shows that even scholars are duped by AI. Working with authors over the years on large textbook projects, it takes a lot of discipline to keep all your sources and citations sorted out. And some people are more diligent about this than others. And really, no one, anywhere, wants to cross-check the references in a manuscript that go 30, 50, or more deep. It is thankless work. And many companies are using AI to do copyediting work, so those references won't get checked that way, either. My new favorite phrase is, "human in the loop".
On another note, I just spent a good bit of time discussing social media as a learning environment with my partner. I think maybe we are cranky, Gen Xers here, but there is so much "negative" learning on social media. I avoid a lot of spaces that give me that vibe, so perhaps I'm missing out on seeing the beauty amidst destruction. I've personally learned a lot in many of the online spaces I'm in, but that is as a result of careful pruning and diligence at evaluating sources and information and fact-checking. Most people aren't so careful and will believe whatever seems plausible. Propaganda is so effective because it often effectively includes true things as well as false ones. I'll have to look into how brains work (or not) to evaluate information when they encounter several things they know to be true in the midst of several things that they don't know, but perhaps assume are true in a sort of halo effect. Or, if I know these things to be true, the other things must be true, too. And then they don't check. No question, it's a problem with AI and Social Media.
Comments
Post a Comment